The highly anticipated report on the Swiss government’s handling of the collapse of Credit Suisse is set to be released soon, and it could have significant implications for the country’s largest bank, UBS. The report, which stems from a parliamentary committee’s investigation, will likely influence how Switzerland regulates its financial sector moving forward, potentially leading to stricter oversight of UBS, the bank that absorbed Credit Suisse in March 2023.
Once a pillar of the Swiss financial establishment, Credit Suisse, the country’s second-largest bank, faced a tumultuous end marked by a series of scandals, culminating in its state-engineered rescue by UBS. The downfall of Credit Suisse not only rattled the Swiss banking industry but also raised questions about the oversight mechanisms in place to prevent such an event from happening again.
In June 2023, the Swiss parliament established a special committee—known as the PUK (Parliamentary Investigative Committee)—to probe the government’s response to the crisis surrounding Credit Suisse’s failure. The report is expected to be released before the end of this year, although no exact date has been set.
The committee’s focus has been on the actions—or lack thereof—taken by Swiss regulators and officials as Credit Suisse’s financial difficulties escalated. The Swiss government has already indicated that the findings of this investigation will serve as the foundation for new regulations aimed at preventing future banking crises. Swiss officials have largely pinned the blame for Credit Suisse’s collapse on the bank’s management rather than regulatory failings.
According to Swiss media, the PUK report will not delve into the issue of bank capital, an aspect that has been a key concern in the wider discussion of the banking sector’s stability. However, the report is expected to offer recommendations related to oversight and the role of FINMA (the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority) in regulating the country’s financial giants.
UBS, which now holds the mantle as Switzerland’s dominant financial institution after its takeover of Credit Suisse, is closely watching the report’s publication. While Andreas Venditti, an analyst at Bank Vontobel, has suggested that the findings will likely not result in immediate regulatory changes for UBS, the report’s tone could have a broader influence on public and political opinion.
“If the findings spark criticism of the handling of the Credit Suisse crisis, that could shift public sentiment and, by extension, the political landscape,” said Venditti. UBS has already voiced concerns over the potential for increased regulatory burdens, particularly with proposals that systemically important banks—like UBS—be required to hold more capital. These proposals were outlined in a set of government recommendations released in April 2024, which were directly tied to the Credit Suisse crisis.
Though UBS has publicly warned that such measures could cloud its outlook, the PUK report’s conclusions could play a pivotal role in determining whether stricter oversight is imposed on the bank and whether any new regulations will be implemented at the national level.
One of the most anticipated aspects of the upcoming report is likely to be criticism of FINMA, Switzerland’s financial watchdog, which has been accused of failing to prevent Credit Suisse’s collapse. Leaks from the committee suggest that FINMA could have taken stronger action as the bank’s troubles deepened. This assessment aligns with earlier statements from FINMA, which has admitted that its ability to intervene was hindered by a lack of power and resources compared to international regulators.
In response to the crisis, FINMA has argued that Switzerland’s regulatory framework requires strengthening. “If Switzerland wants to have even more effective supervision, it needs new instruments and the ability to intervene earlier,” the watchdog stated. This sentiment has been echoed by several officials, including the Swiss Finance Ministry, which has refrained from commenting on the investigation’s specifics but has indicated the necessity of reform.
In addition to FINMA’s handling of the situation, the Swiss National Bank (SNB) and its former chairman, Thomas Jordan, are also expected to face scrutiny. According to media reports, Jordan had initially supported the idea of nationalizing Credit Suisse but was met with resistance from both FINMA and Credit Suisse itself. Critics argue that Jordan could have been more decisive in his public support for the bank’s rescue, which might have mitigated some of the uncertainty surrounding the bank’s fate.
Although the PUK report may not provide an immediate regulatory overhaul for UBS, its findings could have broader political and market implications. The report’s publication is expected to create headlines, potentially shifting the public perception of Switzerland’s banking sector and its regulators. This shift could, in turn, influence future political decisions on how to handle the country’s largest financial institutions, including UBS.
As UBS navigates its newfound prominence after its acquisition of Credit Suisse, the implications of the parliamentary report on UBS’s future regulatory landscape remain uncertain. Should the report lead to public outcry over the handling of Credit Suisse’s fall, UBS could face greater scrutiny from both regulators and the Swiss public. It could also prompt new financial regulations aimed at increasing the capital buffers of systemically important banks, a measure UBS has cautioned against, fearing it could strain its operations.
With the PUK report expected to highlight the shortcomings in the handling of Credit Suisse’s crisis, UBS and other Swiss financial institutions must prepare for the potential ripple effects. The findings could shape the future of Swiss banking regulation, affecting everything from the capital requirements of banks to the powers of FINMA. As UBS looks to stabilize its position in the wake of Credit Suisse’s collapse, the upcoming report will provide crucial insights into the evolving regulatory environment in Switzerland’s banking sector. How the report is received by the public, the political class, and the markets will likely set the tone for the future of UBS and the wider financial industry in Switzerland.
Read more:
